 |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Damocles
Initiate
Joined: Mar 14, 2010
Posts: 36
|
 Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:00 am |
  |
| Scotty wrote: |
What is considered a combat MOS?
All mos deploy. |
It states combat-related, as in tankers, infantry, recon, etc. front-line units. A food service related MOS would not qualify. I was a in a combat related MOS, but I think this particular requirement is BS. All soldiers are first a basic infantry rifleman and we all go through the same training. For a FL CCW you just have to be an honorably discharged veteran, and I think that is the way it should be. |
|
|
  |
|
OIFMarine
Initiate
Joined: Apr 23, 2011
Posts: 33
Location: south of I-80 north of cornfields
|
| Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:24 am |
|
I'm on the other side if the fence on this, and like the combat MOS requirement. I was 0311 rifleman though so I'm biased. |
|
|
|
|
SiliconSorcerer
Corporal
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Posts: 871
|
| Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:29 pm |
|
| CJ797 wrote: |
| SiliconSorcerer wrote: |
| CJ797 wrote: |
From page 25
5 (2) An individual who has qualified to carry a firearm
|
What does that mean? |
The 5 was the line number on the page when I did a copy and paste. Line 6 has the rest of the text. |
No sorry, An individual who has qualified to carry a firearm. Like who could that be? Since it's not legal (unless your a cop) how could you have qualified, I guess I'm missing something. |
|
|
|
|
VannDaddy
Private
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Posts: 185
|
| Posted:
Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:36 am |
|
I was qualified by the state of Pennsylvania to carry a firearm. Does that count? |
|
|
|
|
CJ797
Member
Founders Club
Joined: Feb 02, 2010
Posts: 43
Location: Fairview Heights, IL
|
| Posted:
Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:55 pm |
|
| SiliconSorcerer wrote: |
| CJ797 wrote: |
| SiliconSorcerer wrote: |
| CJ797 wrote: |
From page 25
5 (2) An individual who has qualified to carry a firearm
|
What does that mean? |
The 5 was the line number on the page when I did a copy and paste. Line 6 has the rest of the text. |
No sorry, An individual who has qualified to carry a firearm. Like who could that be? Since it's not legal (unless your a cop) how could you have qualified, I guess I'm missing something. |
The entire line reads as:
(2) An individual who has qualified to carry a firearm
as a retired law enforcement officer.
The 5 and 6 to the side is the line number from the document. If you take a look at the full bill text its easier to understand. |
|
|
|
|
Jimmy121978
Initiate
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Posts: 34
|
| Posted:
Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:10 am |
|
Probably the Chicago Aldermen who are already allowed to carry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
| | | | | |
|
