ICarry.org  
 • Home • Downloads • Your Account • Forums • 
Navigation
Site Info v2.2.2
Last SeenLast Seen
Server TrafficServer Traffic
  • Total: 43,563,621
  • Today: 11,864
Server InfoServer Info
  • Jul 23, 2014
  • 09:19 pm CDT
 
ICarry.org: Forums

 Forum FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

 
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
cmegalodon
Member
Founders Club
Member<br /><b>Founders Club</b>


Joined: Nov 10, 2009
Posts: 221

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:27 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Judge Dismisses Lawsuit
Against IL Ban on Right to Carry - Appealed Filed Within Hours

Judge Sue Myerscough, a federal judge in the U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois, Springfield Division, has granted IL Attorney General Lisa Madigan's motion to dismiss the Second Amendment Foundation's challenge of the statewide ban on carrying a firearm for personal protection. On Friday, Feb. 4th, 2012, Judge Myerscough stated in her opinion:

"This Court finds that the Illinois “Unlawful Use of Weapons” and “Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon” statutes do not violate Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights. The United States Supreme Court and the Seventh Circuit have recognized only a Second Amendment core individual right to bear arms inside the home."

SAF Attorney David Jensen immediately filed an appeal on behalf of the plaintiffs Michael Moore, Charles Hooks, Peggy Fechter, Jon Maier, Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., and Illinois Carry. The appeal will move the case to the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

In response to the judge's ruling Alan Gottlieb, SAF Executive Director, made this statement, "We look forward to winning this important case on appeal even if it means going back to the United States Supreme Court for a third time. The Second Amendment does NOT say, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed except outside your home or that it only applies inside your house. We don't check our constitutional rights at the front door."

To follow the progress of the Moore VS Madigan challenge to the ban on Right to Carry in Illinois, go to IllinoisCarry.com.

_________________
“A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition”

—Rudyard Kipling
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
JTHunter
Corporal
Corporal


Joined: Mar 16, 2010
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:50 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

"Inside the home"? Shocked Yeah, right! Mad

By that premise, Freedom of religion stops at your front door.
Also, Freedom of Speech, of Assembly, of the Press?
"Only" inside the home?

I DON'T THINK SO!!

What else do you expect from the convoluted logic these power-hungry elitists practise?

_________________
“Small minds adhere to the letter of the law; great minds dispense Justice.” - - Oliver Wendell Holmes
View user's profileSend private messageYahoo MessengerICQ Number
Bmanz
Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Apr 27, 2010
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:00 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Unfortunately, the general public is oblivious to their liberties that are eroding each year. This is more than just about firearms; it is the mentality that a body of elected officials know more than anyone else and seek to control every aspect of people's lives in an effort to create a utopia. At the pace we are proceeding, unless something changes I expect to see in my lifetime the school system telling each student what their career may or may not be based on their skin color, sex, sexual-orientation, and scholastic aptitude. Forget the creative thought that has risen humanity to the level of luxury we have at our disposal today; future human progress will be thwarted by the good intentions of the self-proclaimed "progressive movement".
View user's profileSend private message
Jimmy121978
Initiate
Initiate


Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:26 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

What they meant was "Right to bear arms inside the home, after you jump through infinite amounts of hoops, obtain permits which we will do our best to prevent you from obtaining and,well.... let's just say you may want to get a side job. Then, and only then will you be able to purchase one of the 3 small caliber plastic pellet guns which we have not yet deemed unsafe and therefore, illegal. Once purchased drive carefully back to your house because we never said you could have it outside your home and we're low on cash. Enjoy your State of Illinois Constitution's new and improved version of the 2nd Ammendment."
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Page Generation: 0.16 Seconds
:: fisubsilver shadow phpbb2 style by Daz :: RavenNuke theme by www.nukemods.com ::